Framework PPA vs bespoke deal, what's the difference?

How framework PPAs differ from one-off bespoke negotiations: speed, flexibility, pricing implications, and when each makes sense.

A bespoke PPA is negotiated from scratch for each project. The developer approaches funders with a specific site, specific terms, and specific risk profile, and runs a competitive process to find the best capital. Each side's lawyers draft and negotiate the contract.

A framework PPA is built on pre-agreed templates between the developer and one or more institutional funders. The commercial terms (rates, indexation, take-or-pay levels, buyout formulae, novation clauses), the documentation, the credit criteria, and the due diligence standards have all been agreed in advance, before any specific project even exists.

The trade-off is speed and certainty vs maximum negotiating leverage. Framework deals close in weeks; bespoke deals take months. Framework rates are pre-agreed bands rather than the absolute lowest a funder might offer in a competitive auction. But for most commercial sites, the time-to-energisation gap and the certainty of close more than compensates for the small pricing tightening you'd get from running a fresh tender for every project.

Framework PPAs are particularly valuable for: - Multi-site portfolios where you want consistent terms across all sites - Time-sensitive projects where missing a deadline kills the economics - Sites that don't quite hit the size threshold for a bespoke competitive process - Installers who want to offer their customers a turnkey financed solution without taking the funding leg-work themselves

Where bespoke makes more sense: very large single projects (10 MW+), unusual technologies or structures, off-takers with very specific requirements, or when there's a strategic capital partner already engaged.

Got a project to talk through?

MTFD develops and funds commercial solar projects through our institutional PPA panel.

Get in touch →

Related guides